NW Modeling List
nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
Fri Sep 19 09:16:15 EDT 2014
I have the older RR 2-6-6-6, I intended it to label it Virginian, if
someone wants to trade for the virginian one, fine, but I have 4
2-6-6-6's, I don't need more.
I won't jump for the domes, maybe later...or not, too much other
modeling to do..
(unless theres a direct virginian tender out there I'll take it)
On 9/19/2014 8:16 AM, nw-modeling-list-request at nwhs.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:02:17 -0400
> From: NW Modeling List<nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> To: "'NW Modeling List'"<nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> Subject: RE: Virginian AG
> Message-ID:<mailman.3309.1411129007.31775.nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> I agree with you that each of us needs to find his or her own version of
> what is good enough. BTW, I just checked my Key VGN AG and it has incorrect
> domes. When I bought it many years ago I didn't know this. Does it bother
> me now that I know better. No, I got a nice looking locomotive at a good
> price to use as a VGN AG. Would I buy the same model at today's prices now
> that Rivarossi has come out with an AG. I'm not sure.
> Don Marrow
More information about the NW-Modeling-List