Virginian AG

[NW Modeling List]

I have the older RR 2-6-6-6, I intended it to label it Virginian, if 
someone wants to trade for the virginian one, fine, but I have 4 
2-6-6-6's, I don't need more.
I won't jump for the domes, maybe later...or not, too much other 
modeling to do..

(unless theres a direct virginian tender out there I'll take it)

-Lynn-
On 9/19/2014 8:16 AM, nw-modeling-list-request at nwhs.org wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:02:17 -0400
> From: NW Modeling List<nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> To: "'NW Modeling List'"<nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> Subject: RE: Virginian AG
> Message-ID:<mailman.3309.1411129007.31775.nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Frank,
>
> I agree with you that each of us needs to find his or her own version of
> what is good enough.  BTW, I just checked my Key VGN AG and it has incorrect
> domes.  When I bought it many years ago I didn't know this.  Does it bother
> me now that I know better.  No, I got a nice looking locomotive at a good
> price to use as a VGN AG.  Would I buy the same model at today's prices now
> that Rivarossi has come out with an AG.  I'm not sure.
>
>   
>
> Don Marrow
>
>   
>
>