groups

[NW Modeling List]

I'm much closer to Brian's line of thinking, However. Some of the newest
scale models are so detailed they can almost not be handled. But what do I
know, I am turning into "old man yells at clouds." The Proto 2000 GP9's
were nearly the perfect blend of good looks and superb running for my
tastes. The only thing missing from them is today's electronics. I am
really impressed with the new Blunami stuff. I hope the entire industry
moves in that direction.

Mike Rector

On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 7:55 AM NW Modeling List via NW-Modeling-List <
nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote:

> I'm a mix of both but am at a point where I would prefer "contest" level
> quality when possible, especially if I'm purchasing something that's
> read-to-run. I think as a hobby we've moved past the Athearn blue box kit
> with 173 different available road names.
>
> Which I understand there are concessions to be made, and in the end the
> goal for the society is to make money, but if we're offering a model I
> think there's an assumption that the model is fairly accurate. We are a
> historical society after all.
>
> Brian Dembinski
> Amherst, OH
> ________________________________________
> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
> Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20240907/7d9e63b1/attachment.htm>