I sure would like to see a 4-8-0

NW Modeling List nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
Thu Jan 24 08:23:40 EST 2008


Minimum mainline is 40 inches. Super elevated too. My 7 Powerhouse Y3¹s
look correct as they snake thru the scenery, but the BLI, Lifelike, and
Rivirossi engines just look ....wrong. I run in 12 by 20 feet.


Mark Lindsey
Stuck in the 1930¹s





> Mark,

>

> What size radius curves do you have? Some people don't have space for huge

> radius curves and this method of articulation that you hate allows them to run

> on the tighter radius curves. The overhang created by your form of

> articulation would take out scenery on many layouts. Why don't we just enjoy

> the locomotives.

>

> John Rhodes

>

> On Jan 22, 2008 8:21 AM, NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org> wrote:

>> I have given up on the Manufacturers. The BLI Y6b, while it LOOKS good, and

>> RUNS GOOD, it articulates WRONG! The Powerhouse series of Y3's got it right.

>> So, what is BLI's excuse for copying Rivorosi's 55 year old concept? Same

>> for the BLI "A". That was a bad choice they made.

>>

>> Mark Lindsey

>>

>

>

> ________________________________________

> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

> To change your subscription go to

> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

> Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at

> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/










-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/attachments/20080124/1833a294/attachment.html>


More information about the NW-Modeling-List mailing list