Articulation of model locomotives

NW Modeling List nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org
Tue Jan 22 21:27:09 EST 2008


For the Riv Y conversion, I used the drive from the locomotive, I just had to reverse it. I have also done one with the motor in the center, which also works.

Kurt S. Kramke


>From: NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>Date: 2008/01/22 Tue PM 05:00:17 CST

>To: NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>Subject: Re: Articulation of model locomotives



>I think one of the main reasons these folks make them articulate the way

they do is to simplify the drive train. With a REAL articulated, they'd
have to drive the rear engine in the normal way and then run a drive shaft
forward to the front engine (some ingenious fellows put the motor for the
rear engine in the tender and the motor for the front engine in the normal
position, just driving the front engine through flexible couplings).

They way these guys do it, they can use a double-ended motor mounted in the
middle of the boiler and run the front and rear engines like they would a
diesel. Easier, cheaper, and WRONG.

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the Bowser 4-6-6-4 and 4-8-8-4, which do
it right. They're big engines, though, and are capable of sweeping cars on
outer curves off the track if you maintain normal track spacing. But they
will go through a #6 crossover, etc. . .

Ed King


----- Original Message -----
From: "NW Modeling List" <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
To: "NW Modeling List" <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 5:03 PM
Subject: Articulation of model locomotives



> Since we now are on this subject, one that is close to my love of them, I

> have many locomotives that are articulated from many manufacturers( BLI,

> Athearn, Mantua, Riv, Life Like,Brass, and Intermountain).

> Of the plastic/metal ones Mantua and Intermountain are correct in the

> articulation. The cab forward from Intermountain has less over hang than

> the BLI and will work down to 22 inch curves, the Mantua one will work on

> 16 inch curves. The problem I see is that these articulated locomotives

> had restrictions in the prototype and we do not place them on our models.

> These larger locomotives do not look very good on small curves and the

> front couplers cause problems when trying to push cars.

>

> As for the Riv Y, I converted one to articulate properly (article in the

> Arrow). Once converted it would still work on an 18 curve without a big

> overhang. Doing the articulation correctly is not a problem it is just

> easier to continue to produce locomotives as they have been done in the

> past. As for the size of the curve, my old layout had 39 and 41 inch

> curves and the BLI locomotives would knock off cars on the second track

> because of the overhang. None of the other locomotives did this. This is

> why I will not purchase any other locomotive from BLI that is articulated.

>

> Regards,

>

> Kurt S. Kramke

>

>

>>From: NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>>Date: 2008/01/22 Tue AM 08:30:58 CST

>>To: NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>>Subject: Re: I sure would like to see a 4-8-0

>

>>Mark,

>>

>>What size radius curves do you have? Some people don't have space for

>>huge radius curves and this method of articulation that you hate allows

>>them to run on the tighter radius curves. The overhang created by your

>>form of articulation would take out scenery on many layouts. Why don't we

>>just enjoy the locomotives.

>>

>>John Rhodes

>>

>>On Jan 22, 2008 8:21 AM, NW Modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

>>wrote:

>>I have given up on the Manufacturers. Â The BLI Y6b, while it LOOKS good,

>>and RUNS GOOD, it articulates WRONG! Â The Powerhouse series of Y3's got

>>it right. Â So, what is BLI's excuse for copying Rivorosi's 55 year old

>>concept? Â Same for the BLI "A". Â That was a bad choice they made.Â

>>

>>Mark Lindsey

>>

>>

>>

>>________________________________________

>>NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

>>To change your subscription go to

>>http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

>>Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at

>>http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/

>

> ________________________________________

> NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org

> To change your subscription go to

> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list

> Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at

> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/



________________________________________
NW-Modeling-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-modeling-list
Browse the NW-Modeling-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-modeling-list/



More information about the NW-Modeling-List mailing list