4-8-0 "survey" results
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Wed Jul 29 13:16:03 EDT 2015
interesting its NOT BLI, your making me think who in the market may go
this direction, I have one or 2 clues, but its all guessing. good luck
on this endeavor, its a positive direction, perhaps it will bounce more
interest out there, one step at a time.
On 7/29/2015 1:38 AM, nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org wrote:
> 4-8-0 "survey" results
> NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
> 7/28/2015 12:06 PM
> NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>, NW Modeling List
> <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>
> I thought I should share the results. We got a significant number of
> suggestions (mostly tactful, some not)that we clarify which M we were
> talking to the manufacturer/importer about. Our discussions hadn't
> reached that level, as we were simply exploring the possibility of a
> "low price" N&W 4-8-0. The results of the survey made it clear that
> our best bet is the M, specifically the way it looks (tender,
> fittings, etc.)at Strasburg today. It is clear to most of our members
> that some mass-market appeal will, we think, substantially increase
> the viability of this project.
> I got some comments about getting my M, M-1, and M-2 straighter in my
> mind. I don't have it where I want it, but I'm a lot closer than I
> was two weeks ago (thank you, again, and as always, Col. Jeffries and
> Harold Davenport).
> We got a good number of "You should do the M in a version with
> variations, especially tenders"; we're going to pass that on, but the
> cost-effectiveness of that will be determiend by the
> We got a good number of "Instead of an M you guys should do ".
> We're listening to all of that, but some are probably less likely than
> others. I'd like an LC-2, but I'm not holding my breath.
> And, we got a surprising number of "at that price I'd be interested in
> one or two". I'm quite pleased we did this.
> We forwarded the results and constructive suggestions to the
> manufacturer/importer. We've been asked to keep "his" name quiet for
> the time being. It's not Broadway, but we're looking at that type of
> model with that level of quality and in that price ballpark. We will
> keep you posted as to what happens next.
> For those of you who replied with expressions interest and
> constructive suggestions/comments/cirticism, thank you.
> Frank Bongiovanni, NWHS Modeling Committee
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NW-Mailing-List