More on signal "roolz"
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Fri Aug 16 22:14:52 EDT 2013
Trains were superior to each other by right, class or direction. Right was conferred by train order. Class and direction were conferred by the operating timetable. The N&W Book of Rules stated that unless otherwise provided, eastward or northward trains were superior to west or southward trains.
The predominate direction of loaded coal traffic on N&W depended upon where you were. If you were Bluefield and east of there, the loaded coal traffic was mainly eastbound. If you were at Williamson or west, it was westbound. If you were at Iaeger, you would see loaded coal trains pass in both directions, and the same with empties. Eastbound coal off the Buchanan Branch went past Iaeger, and westbound coal off the Tug Fork Branch too; coal off the Dry Fork Branch at Iaeger went in both directions. That fact alone would make Iaeger a fun place to model. You could run coal and empty trains in both directions, and when other modelers wondered what was going on you could let them know.
Coal traffic on the Virginian was mainly eastbound; I think the westbound loads interchanged at Deepwater and other places like Gilbert didn’t amount to very much. One did, however, see the occasional lake-bound VGN G-4 gon (the big guys) in westbound coal trains out of Portsmouth.
From: NW Mailing List
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:44 PM
To: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Subject: Re: More on signal "roolz"
I think that says a lot on various circumstances.
Railroad had to designate a direction superior such as the westbound freight vs the eastbound,
to avoid engineers getting into fights who takes the siding....
I tend to think the N&W had a predominate coal traffic move westbound so its obvious to me to make westbound trains the superior direction.
After acquiring the VGN they could study traffic moves and adjust track, signals to their liking design, removing the double track is to single with sidings one example.
Technically the siding may be only one signal block long so you would not display a R/G going into the siding. Exiting you could get the R/G. Even if the block ahead the siding was clear you probably would not get the R/G entering it, mainly because that track ends and passes back into the main.
I have a yard throat with working target signals and it gets interesting deciding how the signal aspects should be.
On 8/16/2013 11:34 AM, nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org wrote:
Subject: More on signal "roolz"
From: NW Mailing List mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Date: 8/16/2013 10:22 AM
To: NW Mailing List mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
the other day the subject came up about why do some signals give a
Diverging Clear, while others will only display a Diverging Approach.
This gets LONG and complicated and is hard to explain. If you get
confused, ask before you throw tomatoes at me, because I may not word
it the best way. I'm a signalman, not a book writer! And, I'm lousy
and proofreading my own stuff, so...
This is more or less how it's been explained to me by the signalmen
who trained me through the years.
It depends on how the track is designated in the operating rules. If
a track is designated as a Double Track situation, with Main One, and
Main Two, (or in the old rules as Eastbound, Westbound, Northbound,
Southbound), the signals will be able to give a Diverging Clear coming
out of a siding, but will not be able to give a Clear coming out of
the siding. Why? Because the siding is the inferior route. Yes,
there were and are exceptions to this, but for the most part, that's
how the N&W's doubletrack was everywhere I've been.
A good example of this is the Christiansburg District. It used to be
double tracked as we all know, and now is designated as a Double Track
to Single Track situation because some of the double track was removed
after the Virginian merger. For the mostpart, the westbound track was
left intact, and the eastbound track that remained became the sidings
and also became the inferior route (because you'd be traveling
westward on what was the eastbound track). Confused yet? It gets
A single track with sidings had no directional designation, so there
was no inferior and superior route. (Or well, actually there was, but
because the track itself was bi-directional, the inferior route
received a shorter signal mast to designate it as the inferior route).
Still not confused? I'll keep trying!!
Here's a good example of confusion: At the new Ashby and Marsh Run
double track north of Front Royal, those signals were set up for
Diverging Clear out of the siding as a double track would be. That
was because they originally were setting it up as a Main One/Main Two
operation. Then, they changed their mind at the last minute and
designated it as a Main One/Siding setup. We left the signals as they
had been designed when we put all that in service. The new siding
extensions between Berryville and Audley can give clear out of the
siding, and this only adds to the confusion!
Here's another exception: Before the pole line elimination/signal
changeover on the Bristol Line, the east end of Abingdon and the east
end of Glade Spring could only give Diverging Clear coming out of
their sidings, but they were not in double track territory. So, why
were they set up this way? They were in Yard Limits when they were
originally installed, and I assume that was why, but I'm not certain.
Now, they give Clear coming out of the sidings because they are
designated as Main One track and Siding and the yard limits are long
If I've got anything wrong, maybe Mr. H.W. Bundy can straighten me
out. But, learning how signal systems work takes years of dealing
with them. When I hired, I was told it would take me ten years to get
a good grasp on them, but they told me I had that in five years.
With signals, there are situations and rules and so many other factors
to consider, that each situation requires its own specific
engineering. That is why they are so hard to understand. Every
location is a little different, and specific to what is around it.
Switches nearby, crossings, slide fences, foreign railroads, etc.all
factor in to the design and engineering. It is not an exact science.
They design it for what they need at the time.
So, for the modeler, if you had a signal that seemed to be "out of
place", you can explain it with your specific rules. If I had all
position lights on my layout except for one searchlight signal, I
would justify it by saying its "bulletined in the special
That's enough rambling for now.
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NW-Mailing-List