Mail transportation on the N&W Tug Fork Branch

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at
Sat Oct 24 01:06:18 EDT 2009

The Employee Time Table for January 1930, shows Third Class (mixed trains) for he following Pocahontas Division branch lines; Pond Creek, Lewis Creek, Honaker and Big Creek.  You might want to get a copy of the re-print from the N&WHS store if they are still available.


--- On Fri, 10/23/09, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at> wrote:

From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at>
Subject: Re: Mail transportation on the N&W Tug Fork Branch
To: nw-mailing-list at
Date: Friday, October 23, 2009, 2:53 PM

I too am interested in how any non - coal hopper traffic and how much of it was moved on branches mostly existing to service coal mines.

I have a small O scale railroad that is loosely based on an N&W coal branch.  I always assumed that a boxcar of mining supplies or other freight would just be mixed in with the coal hoppers and brought up on a mine turn when needed. 

However I have many steam era boxcars and a 4-8-0.  I would love to a model a daily mixed freight on my coal branch.

Any further info is greatly appreciated.

Thanks is advance.
Tom Lewis,

-----Original Message-----
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at>
To: nw-mailing-list at
Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2009 12:24 pm
Subject: Mail transportation on the N&W Tug Fork Branch

Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:55:20 -0400

From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at>

Subject: N&W in 1910--Mail service

Bluefield Daily Telegraph

April 7, 1910



Inaugurated on Tug Fork Branch of Norfolk and Western

The Norfolk and Western has inaugurated a new mail service on the Tug Fork

branch. Two mails a day now go to Anawalt and this service is greatly

appreciated. The people along the Anawalt section now want an opportunity to

get the train to lay over at Pageton or Anawalt at night instead of at Gary as

they figure in this way they will be able to go to Welch or some other point and

return the same day. An effort will also be made to get a local freight service

on the line. There are eighteen or twenty mines on the Tug Fork branch and the

coal companies along the line feel that enough business goes to and from these

operations to warrant a local freight. It is likely that a petition will be

prepared asking for such an extension of the local freight service.


[If there were no local freight service on Tug Fork branch how did these

eighteen or so mines get the material for the tipples and mine material such as

rails, cars, etc? As far as that goes how did any mines get started before the

railroad reached the mine location?]

Gordon Hamilton

October 23, 2009

Hello, Gordon:

Wasn't "local freight" service primarily for carload and less-than-carload

merchanidise freight? My recollection is that "mine runs" on the N&W were not

considered local freight.

Regarding the mail service, the Railway Mail Service Third Division would have

made a determination that mail volume and dispatches warranted mail being

handled on a second train. Although there were frequent communications between

a railroad's manager of mail (who also usually handled the express company

service relationships, too) and the district RMS staff, the added service would

have been initiated by the RMS, not the N&W.

Good morning,

Frank Scheer

f_scheer at


NW-Mailing-List at

To change your subscription go to

Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

NW-Mailing-List at
To change your subscription go to
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list