A Signal Question for Ben et.al.

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Mon Jun 24 05:38:54 EDT 2013

I worked the Shenandoah line a few years ago as a relief maintainer,
but all the old stuff was gone before I got there. But, I know where
you are talking about, and I'm aware of that type of situation. The
Bristol line also had several staggered automatics. Basically, it
would depend on how the engineers drew up the signal circuits. While
I'm not certain, I would expect that once the head end of the train
passed the opposing staggered signal and knocked down the next track
circuit to the south, then the signal would have dropped to
restricting. The ones I witnessed in action on the Bristol line would
drop shortly after the head end passed the governing signal,
regardless of whether they were staggered or not. I can't really
answer why that particular one signal didn't drop. I would have
expected it to.

If I saw that happen today, I'd be calling the maintainer!


On 6/23/13, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:

> /"//Maybe it has to do with where the signal is placed versus where the

> block actually begins. Jim Nichols"


> /Jim,

> I don't see a number plate on the signal. This would make it a

> "Home" signal. If that is the case, the insulated joint should be right

> there at the signal. (If this is on the Southern and is not CTC

> territory, things may be very different. Which is why I deferred to the

> signalmen on the forum.)


> Ben,

> A two to four second delay would seem about normal. Most signals I

> have seen will drop in about the time the second unit passes the signal.

> There was one exception that I did notice years ago.


> Before the signal changeover, there was a southbound intermediate signal

> at about mp H146.3. We had just left Waynesboro after picking up and

> setting off. South of the siding at Dupont, I noticed a handbrake

> sticking and walked up to the lead unit to get the engineer to stop the

> train. When we did stop, we had just past a clear signal at H146.3 by an

> engine and a half. I walked back, removed the sticking brake and on

> return to the head end noticed that the signal was still showing clear.

> I thought that very odd, but, figured that since it was an intermediate

> signal (and at that time northbound and southbound intermediates were

> staggered and hardly ever side by side) the block joints may be staggered.


> In the past few years, changes were made in the rules governing

> single unit moves as to block occupancy in order to protect a move that

> for whatever reason didn't shunt the track.


> Jimmy Lisle



More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list