Fwd: Transition from "In <location name>" from "at <location name>

[NW Mailing List]

Oops, I sent the below to the wrong mailing list (modeling instead of the main list). 

From: Matt Goodman <mgoodman312 at icloud.com>
Subject: Transition from "In <location name>" from "at <location name>
Date: May 30, 2023 at 2:26:40 PM EDT
To: nw modeling List <nw-modeling-list at nwhs.org>

My father has a fat library of literature and magazines from bygone days. I’ve noticed that older industry writings typically used “at” to reference cities / towns the railroad passed through. Here’s an example from a 1926 employee magazine:

The eastbound crossing frog at Chillicothe with the Chillicothe Street Railway has been taken out and straight rails put in. 

We extend to Floyd Mann, chief clerk, at this station, our sincere sympathy in the loss of his father, who died at Gahanna, O.,

If I wrote that sentence today, I would say “in Chillicothe” and “in Gahanna”. 

When / why did that change? Is that type of structure unique to railroads? Or is this a shift in how the language is used more generally?

Matt Goodman
Columbus, Ohio, US

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20230530/0db01fb0/attachment.htm>