Arrow - Detour Routes
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Sat Aug 20 23:30:32 EDT 2022
Thanks for the reply, Harry. Given that the C&O, N&W and Virginian were all similar very similar in the type of heavy traffic and locomotives they used, I suspect bridges weren’t the limiting factor. Since the Virginian ran fatter locomotives than the N&W (the AE’s) and Ys could detour anywhere on their line, I figured width must have been the limiting factor - the C&O must have been a bit too tight?
Matt Goodman
Columbus, Ohio
Sent from my mobile
On Aug 15, 2022, at 12:05 PM, NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
Matt Goodman
Columbus, Ohio
I don't know that this is the reason that C&O couldn't accept Class Y locomotives, but railroads complied with Cooper Ratings. This was a measure of the maximum weight a bridge could handle, which among other things, was based on the spacing of piling. EXAMPLE: The loading piers for PRR's Cape Charles-Little Creek ferry could accept one car weighing 263,000 lbs., but not two coupled together. Cooper Ratings on N&W's Abingdon Branch (50-some timber trestles) limited gross weight of a car to 220,000 lbs. As I recall, for locomotives, the rating was based on a 2-8-2, but I'm not familiar driver spacing OR diameter. Harry Bundy
________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20220820/f8ef0d65/attachment.htm>
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list