External reducing valves

[NW Mailing List]

On 2/11/2019 2:17 PM, NW Mailing List wrote:

> Larry,
> If I remember the drawings correctly, the intercepting valve was moved 
> outside along with the reducing valve. The saddle was then gutted. The 
> reducing valve was not the problem. It didn't move.
> It was the intercepting valve that did move and required lubrication 
> that was the culprit. Maybe, this whole thing is a bit of a misnomer.
>
> Jimmy Lisle
>
Larry,
     Now that I found my drawings, I see that I was wrong and the 
intercepting valve was left in the saddle and in a much simpler manner.

Before:


After:

Jimmy Lisle


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20190211/1872c85f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Fig21.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2313095 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20190211/1872c85f/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Booster Valve.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2696493 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20190211/1872c85f/attachment-0003.jpg>