odd photo
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Sun May 17 08:58:17 EDT 2015
Lynn:
Please re-read Prince's book. The Z1s, a and b, (not "L") were ALL
compound engines. The Z1 and Z1a were built with slide-valve low pressure
cylinders. Those rebuilt to Z1b got piston valve low pressure cylinders; there
may have been other improvements, too, but others more knowledgeable about
such details can fill that in.
There was one (1) fully simple Z, class Z2, No. 1399.
This link http://www.steamlocomotive.com/2-6-6-2/?page=nw is helpful.
Dave Phelps
In a message dated 5/17/2015 8:08:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org writes:
I can verify reading princes book 1331 is the lowest numbered engine to
get the treatment from an L1a to an L1b. N&W is no stranger to reworking
their engines, The point is about the L1b it has low pressure front cylinders,
while the L1a is basically a full simple engine.
This is about grinding on the mountains to move that coal at low speed.
The simple engines could move faster. The reason why is the larger cylinders
at higher speed cause reverse pressures which does not work well for higher
speeds, but low speeds are fine, why the Y class compound development,
drag that freight over them mountains.
N&W could probably pick and choose the best engines in condition to take
the modification and last many more years, and that they did with all of
their steam lineup, but again other lower end steamers met the scrappers torch
while steam technology advanced. The Roanoke shops were very talented
keeping the steam fleet alive why many of the older engines lasted to the end.
M2c's built in 1917 still working in 1958? wotta run.
-Lynn-
On 5/16/2015 7:30 AM, _nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org_
(mailto:nw-mailing-list-request at nwhs.org) wrote:
Subject:
Re: odd photo
From:
NW Mailing List _<nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>_
(mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org)
Date:
5/15/2015 9:23 PM
To:
"NW Mailing List" _<nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>_
(mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org)
yabbut the 1333 and 1334 didn’t last to the end like the 1331 and 1339 did
. . .
EdK
From: _NW Mailing List via NW-Mailing-List_
(mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org)
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:51 PM
To: _nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org_ (mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org)
Cc: _NW Mailing List_ (mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org)
Subject: Re: odd photo
Ed, http://nwhs.org/data/steam/ says 1333 and 1334 were also converted,
07-1930 and 12-1929 respectively, not that it's a big deal...
Dave Phelps
In a message dated 5/15/2015 2:43:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
_nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org_ (mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org) writes:
Yep, it was the lowest-numbered 2-6-6-2 to be converted. Since it was one
of the second order of the 2-6-6-2s, one wonders what drove the decision
not to convert a lower numbered engine. Luck of the draw, perhaps; the 1331
and 1339 were the only two converted out of the order that covered the
1315-1339.
All you who guessed right, you win the prizes; go buy yourselves a drink.
EK
________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20150517/192e1c04/attachment.html>
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list