Restoration candidates

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Tue Dec 17 16:43:55 EST 2013


The Reading inspection locomotive "Black Diamond" at the St. Louis MOT
is a somewhat different situation than the Y6.
The BD was originally "on loan" to the Museuml; then came the formation
of Conrail. As the legalities of Conrail were
being finalized, the inheritors of Reading property uncovered the
unwanted BD, then residing in St. Louis. Conrail
sold the BD directly to the MOT; within the past two years it has been
externally restored and placed on display.

Back to the 2156 - just suggesting that inquiries made 20 or more years
ago may not be relevant now; present
management of the MOT may be more receptive tp parting with a
locomotive which has no St. Louis history while
they focus on preservation and restoration of St. Louis related
artifacts ( such as the last Wabash steam loco, a
St. Louis PCC, NYS Mohawk, etyc ). The question should be asked.

Jerome Crosson; (once NJ; now St. Peters MO).

-----Original Message-----
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
To: nw-mailing-list <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Sent: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 9:51 am
Subject: Re: Restoration candidates

I'm actually enjoying this conversation guys... Let's keep it up.
 
Signed...
 
Richard D. Shell
Troutville, VA
 
In a message dated 12/17/2013 6:55:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org writes:
The conversations here have been all over the place of all
the coulda, woulda, shoulda, wanta, wannabes for restoring this or
that favorite locomotive, wherever it may be located, and hopefully
preserved. Enough already, let it go, let's move on as at least these
two animals are forever ensconced in their respective museums,
probably for eternity, stuffed and mounted. The animal is no longer
free to roam where it once did so quite successfully.


Many such properties, once they receive such things do not feel the
need or desire to let it out of their grasp ever again, for whatever
the reason. IRM is not one of such properties as they have probably
done a better job at restoration and preservation than many others.
They are not perfect but they try hard and mean well and do share.


As for the 2156 owners, regardless of the cracked frame segments, all
that is restoreable should the parties so desire. All it takes is a
willing railroad and then lots of $$$$$$$$. Over the years, take a
look at what significant rail objects with flanged wheels this
property has permitted to return to its former environments or even
off its own property unless in the total care, custody and control of
its people? Answer -- little if anything significant. Five years ago,
Who would have thought that a Big Boy really would be restored? Okay,
it hasn't happened yet, but ifr I were a gambler, I wouldn't be
making odds against this one. However, look at what has departed St.
Louis, once it was there? Answer -- not much and if so name it,
please? What HASN'T left where genuinely interested and caring
parties would have liked the items back into its original home
territory for display and recognitions? The Reading inspection engine
didn't leave; neither did the 2156 some 30+ years ago when polite and
discreet inquiries were made. And then DL&W 952, albeit with some
serious faux-pas on the parts of both interested parties, still sits
in St. Louis, too. Nothing leaves there once it arrives and barring a
serious change in managerial attitude, probably never will, either.


Everything can't "return home" sure and the parties which have served
as the willing hosts need proper appreciations made on their behalf,
but the idea of permanently stuffing and mounting these iron horses in
a permanent manner, and many others for that matter, too, I find sad.
I can go to a zoo and see stuffed and mounted long-deceased animals,
but to see the beats roam in its native habitat, now THAT's something
to behold, be it Y6a, or any of the dozens of others around, many of
which have received minimal care, which is also sad.


So, unless there is something new, let's cut this discussion as it's
going to lead nowhere further and let's get on with some real
productive and  investigative discussion.


Subject: 2156 and 2050 restoration

As a Virginia transplant to Illinois and N&W Historical Society
member, I want to let you know I would hate for the Illinois Railway
Museum to lose the 2050 and for the National Transportation Museum in
St Louis to lose the 2156. There are N&W fans worldwide and we like
having a small piece of its history in easy driving distance. That
said, I do understand the desire to bring the girls home to Roanoke.
And seeing them under steam would be glorious ... since I have missed
everything since then, steam wise. Something neat happened at IRM--I
was videotaping a kid about 5 years old running around being a
nuisance .. (to everyone but me) ... he climbed on the nose of 2050
and was yanking the bell cord...I muttered to myself, That's N&W
brass, boy, and you just go to town and let me record.? His parents
have no idea that they were the ones being a nuisance...they took him
off the locomotive!
Mike Shockley
Peoria, IL







________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/




More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list