Tunnel design question

NW Mailing List nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Thu Aug 26 08:06:16 EDT 2010


Thanks for the information. Did the under cutting occur, or did the liner
get notched?



R.D. Williams





_____

From: nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org
[mailto:nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org] On Behalf Of NW Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:55 AM
To: NW Mailing List
Subject: RE: Tunnel design question



Mike,

I am attaching the engineering study for Huger Tunnel. It
is a large file and I hope the moderator will allow it to go through. In
this you will find what options were considered and why they chose the one
that they did. A lot of thought went into this as you will see. If you want
to re-visit the good old days, hopefully we will have something for you to
read about Christmas.

Mason Cooper




[Moderator]
See PDF report at following:
http://nwhs.org/mailinglist/Huger_Tunnel_Assessment_Report.pdf

From: nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org
[mailto:nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org] On Behalf Of NW Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:15 PM
To: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Subject: Tunnel design question



Does anyone know what factors went into the separated design of Huger or
Montgomery tunnels versus both tracks through the same bore like Elkhorn,
Davy and Roderfield?

Are there other separated tunnels (other than Hatfields, which were bored at
separate times?)

Michael Shockley



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20100826/3a93a982/attachment.htm>


More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list