Iaeger and Southern

[NW Mailing List]

Alex,

If you develop any pieces to this puzzle, I would like to learn of them.

I had seen from the topo map how rugged the terrain is north of Low Gap Divide and wondered where the line could have gone from there.  Part of the puzzle is why the only proposed line in this area shown on the annual report maps from 1903 thru 1930 was from Dry Fork Branch (nee Iaeger & Southern) to Pocahontas or Boissevain.

To help others who may not be familiar with the area that we are discussing, I am attaching portions of the annual report maps of 1903 and 1930 showing the proposed line into Pocahontas or Bossevaine in dashes.

Gordon Hamilton
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: NW Mailing List 
  To: NW Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:41 AM
  Subject: Re: Iaeger and Southern


  Gordon,

  The simplist way to get to Pocahontas would have been to follow Jacobs Fork to Horsepen Creek and then up Horsepen Creek as far as possible and then continue up Abbs Valley to Pocahontas.  The desired direction up Low Gap Branch to Low Gap Divide would have taken you into what became Munson (US Steel operation No 14) and the headwaters of the South Fork of the Tug Fork. At this this point the Tug Fork only flowed West.  However if you turned East and followed the Road Fork Branch you would be on the old Abbs Valley and Tug Road Turnpike that crossed the mountains near the headwaters of the Ballard-Harmon Branch at a place called the Jumps (or possibly known locally as Harmon's Gap). This is near where Jenkinjones Operation No. 8 was located.  Both of these routes are in very mountainous teritory and I have driven on both of them.  Low Gap is one mountain range further North from the Jumps and is closer to Jenkinjones Operations No.6 and No. 7.  I attempted the road from Jenkinjones through Low gap to Virginia once but turned back and went over the Jumps instead.

  Given the mountainous terrain it would make sense to tunnel from Low Gap Branch into WV to the headwaters of the South Fork of the Tug Fork.  However the extension itself doesn't make any sense in 1904.  By 1904 the N&W Tug Fork Branch was already at Pageton or pass the point where the South Fork and North Fork of the Tug Fork joined to form the Tug Fork. It would have been easier to build the railroad up the South Fork of the Tug Fork (as the N&W did in 1946 and 1947 to reach Munson) or up the North Fork of the Tug Fork as the N&W did in 1912 to reach Jenkinjones. Although neither of these solutions would have provided a loop between the Dry Fork and Pocahontas.

  A possible explanation is the route described would have been over land owned by the Pocahontas Coal & Coke Company whereas going up Abbs Valley would have required the purchase of land. I believe a railroad from Berwind to Pocahontas would have gone in a significantly different direction unless you tunneled under the mountain from Canebrake to what became Bishop.  It appears that by 1910 the idea of Berwind to Pocahontas was losing favor in lieu of the opportunity to go Berwind to Cedar Bluff.

  Another unknown factor in all of this is what the thinking was with respect to potential coal operations along the proposed route.

  I have another 1904 Iaeger and Southern article to post now that I am back from some traveling.    

  Alex
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: NW Mailing List 
    To: NW Mailing List 
    Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:42 PM
    Subject: Re: Iaeger and Southern


    Alex,

    Your questions about the 1904 newspaper article stimulated me to do some research.  Because you know far more about the coal fields than I do, I have to look things up to understand them.

    N&W annual report maps show the proposed "loop" as a stylized line as follows:

    1903, 1904   Avondale - Perryville - Pocahontas
    1905   Ritter - Perryville - Pocahontas
    1906, 1907   Berwin - Pocahontas
    1908   Berwin - Canebrake - Pocahontas
    1909   Canebrake - Pocahontas
    1910 - 1930   Canebrake - Bossevain
    (1930 was last annual report showing the loop)

    A "Certificate of Extension, Iaeger and Southern Railway Company, dated May 12, 1904" in the NWHS Archives describes the extension [added comments are from MS TerraServer topo map], "...shall commence at the present terminus of the line of the Iaeger and Southern Railway Company at or near the mouth of Jacob's Fork [near Rift] in McDowell, West Virginia, and run thence by the most practicable route up the said Jacob's Fork to the mouth of Horsepen Creek [at Bishop]; thence up Horsepen Creek by the most practicable route to the mouth of Low Gap Branch [east of Horsepen]; thence up Low Gap Branch by the most practicable route to the head of Low Gap Branch and crossing Low Gap Divide, entering the head waters of Tug Fork; thence in a generally easterly direction around and along the waters of Tug Fork to and terminating at a point on the state line between the States of West Virginia and Virginia, at or near Harmon's Gap [not on topo map]in the County of McDowell, in the State of West Virginia...."

    So, this Low Gap Divide is apparently different from the Low Gap near Jenkinjones.  The latter would appear to be the way the proposed line would cross into Virginia, the Bluestone River drainage and Bossevain.

    Also, the topo map shows the Virginia state line forming a "finger" pointing north in the vicinity of the head of Low Gap Branch.  This state line goes around a north-pointing ridge, so this could be the place where the proposed line would go through Virginia entirely in a tunnel.

    There is no mention in the Certificate of Extension about the portion of the line from the West Virginia state line to Bossevein, VA.  Possibly, the N&W had previous authority to build from Bossevain to the WV line.

    Anybody have any more thoughts on this?

    Gordon Hamilton
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: NW Mailing List 
      To: N&W Mailing List 
      Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:10 PM
      Subject: Iaeger and Southern


      Bluefield Daily Telegraph
      July 10, 1904

      Tunnel Into Virginia and Then Tunnel Out

      Iaeger-Southern Loop Extension Will Open Rich Coal Deposits

      Rader Sinss, civil engineer, is now engaged in making a preliminary survey and located the route
      for an extension of the Iaeger Southern Railway, one of the Norfolk and Western's numerous branch 
      lines, from a point near Iaeger, in McDowell County, to the rich coal deposits back of Pocahontas in 
      Tazewell County.

      The proposed extension will enter Tazewell County by means of a tunnel, and in order to get into 
      West Virginia another tunnel will be necessary.  The present plan, it is understood, is for the eastern end
      of the road to connect with the main line of the Norfolk and Western  at a point in this county [Mercer], 
      thus completing a loop.

      A charter has been granted, it is learned, empowering the promoters to build the road, and it is not thought 
      that any time will be lost in beginning the work of construction.  Nothing definite could be learned as to the 
      probable cost of the new extension, nor as to when it is likely to be completed, but it is thought that the work 
      will be let to contract in the near future. 

      The Roanoke Times of yestrday says:
      "The state corporation commission has just had under consideration a novel case, it being the application of 
      the Iaeger and Southern Railway Company of West Virginia, for permission to build a loop from a point in 
      McDowell County, West Virginia, in to the county of Tazewell, VA., and thence back into the state of West Virginia.  
      The proposed loop  extension will be made into this state for a distance of from 1,700 to 1,800 feet, and this will 
      be in a tunnel.  The road is a coal road controlled by the Norfolk and Western railway, President L.E. Johnson 
      being at the head of both.  It will tunnel from the West Virginia line into this state and back into West Virginia, this 
      being the most feasible route of reaching points it desires to reach.  The commission, in granting the application, 
      requires the the railway company to file copies of its charter and to convey to some persons in this state power of 
      attorney to represent it.  The proposed extension will enter Virginia at Low Gap, in Tazewell County. 

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Alex Schust

      (Note:  There is not much in this article that makes sense other than the Iaeger and Southern wanted to build an extension which was probably down the Dry Fork to Berwind. If there was to be a loop it was probably to connect with an extension on Jacob's Fork.  At one time there was an idea to build a railroad into Virginia and then up Horsepen Creek to connect with N&W at Pocahontas.  Current Low Gap, VA is located near Jenkinjones, WV which is no where near the Iaeger and Southern. A Nov 16, 1904 article that I believe has been posted before talked about how the Dry Fork extension had been let to contract with the railroad entering Tazewell County and going to Pocahontas.  It was expected (by the newspaper) that the Dry Fork extension from Iaeger to Pocahontas would become the mainline and the route through Elkhorn would become a branch line.  However the coming of the Virginian spurred the N&W to upgrade its line from Bluefield to Iaeger and it remained the main line as the route from the Dry Fork extension was never built to Pocahontas.) 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      ________________________________________
      NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
      To change your subscription go to
      http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
      Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
      http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/ 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG. 
      Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release Date: 5/5/2008 6:01 AM



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ________________________________________
    NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
    To change your subscription go to
    http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
    Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
    http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ________________________________________
  NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
  To change your subscription go to
  http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
  Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
  http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG. 
  Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1428 - Release Date: 5/12/2008 7:44 AM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20080514/d8b1c72c/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1930map.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 74052 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20080514/d8b1c72c/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1903map.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 55605 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20080514/d8b1c72c/attachment-0003.jpg>