2-6-6-2 pivot pins

nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Sun Apr 2 22:54:01 EDT 2006


Jim - UP purchased no 2-6-6-2s from N&W, or anybody else. They purchased Y-3s 2013, 2020, 2025, 2030 and 2041, which became UP 3674, 3671, 3672, 3670 and 3673 respectively.

Bill Kratville's book THE WAR ENGINES covers the 2-8-8-2s UP bought from C&O and N&W. Kratville makes no mention of pivot pins cracking, although some frames broke due to high speed operation.

A crack in a pivot pin doesn't seem like a likely problem; for one thing, it'd be hard to detect before it broke completely, which did happen but very rarely. It certainly wasn't a common problem on N&W.

Ed King
----- Original Message -----
From: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
To: N&W Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: 2-6-6-2 pivot pins


I have been reading Tennessee Central Railway, History, Locomotives and Cars by Cliff Downey, TLC 2005.

The TC purchased four 2-6-6-2's from N&W in 1943-44 being N&W 1341, 1385, 1390 and 1396. The author indicates that TC experienced problems with these locomotives and proffers the problem was due to cracks in the pivot pins that connected the two sets of drivers. He also indicates that Union Pacific experienced similar problems with 2-6-6-2 locomotives it purchased from N&W during WWII.

Was this a common problem on the Z class? If so, what was N&W's solution to it?

Jim Brewer



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
To change your subscription go to
http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20060402/25458082/attachment.html


More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list