Signals

nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Tue Sep 28 08:40:27 EDT 2004


So if one was modelling the N&W in that region around 1952 or so, they would want to not use semaphore and instead target signals?

Bob Welsh
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org 
  To: N&W Mailing List 
  Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 4:10 PM
  Subject: Re: Signals



    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org 
    To: nw-mailing-list 
    Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:31 PM
    Subject: Signals



    I was reading an article in Trains mag on Cincinnati Sept 2002.  Speaking on the Cinti District, they said automatic signals were installed in 1926.  I checked in the N&W Reports CD and it says the same.  I talked to a signal maintainer in 2003, and he said the signals were installed in 1946/1947.  The Reports CD says that CTC was installed in 1947 after the line changed between Peebles and Mineral Springs.

    Q; Were the 1926 signals the Semaphore type, or were they the CPLs? 

    Semaphores.

    What was the change with the signals in 1947?

    Installation of CTC with the new signals.

    Ed King
    Jeff Wood
    twlv18japie at earthlink.net
    Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ________________________________________
    NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
    http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ________________________________________
  NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
  http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/private/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20040928/eea74619/attachment.html


More information about the NW-Mailing-List mailing list